… Unanimous. Pierce for the Court. No details, just that Kidd “erred when he stated that ‘a reasonable person reading the bill could not discern what the law allows and what it permits.’” No quotation or discussion of the statutory text.
A bit sketchy, but OTOH, as much attention as the silly argument merited. TBA does not admire the wisdom behind the statute, but it’s validly enacted & on the books.
… Tom Freeland calls the order one that he “can only read as saying, ‘Enough of this bullshit, already.’” That puts it nicely.